keronowl.blogg.se

Eye candy men
Eye candy men










eye candy men eye candy men eye candy men

I will bite my vir­tual tongue here and not re­spond with an iron­ical, “Duh.” And d es­pite reading like satire, I couldn’t find any in­di­ca­tion on the Newsweek site that it was any­thing but se­rious (sic) journalism.

eye candy men

Writer Sydney Pereirab noted that the posted photos of “guy candy” tended to be mostly white men, “de­spite London being a mul­ti­cul­tural city.” From this, Ms Pereira drew the con­clu­sion that “white, male priv­i­lege is still an at­trac­tive quality.” Pic­tures showing other rep­re­sen­ta­tions of mas­culinity, such as fa­ther­hood, and more emo­tional and awkward-appearing men were far less frequent.” Items that in­di­cated wealth such as smart suits, watches and phones were emphasized. “The photos and com­ments fo­cused on the men’s bi­ceps, pecs and chest as well as per­ceived sexual ability. This academic-oriented paper found its way into the pop­ular media where I found it on the Newsweek web­site with the en­gag­ingly con­de­scending title, “ Men With Mus­cles and Money Are More At­trac­tive to Straight Women and Gay Men-Showing Gender Roles Aren’t Pro­gressing.” The re­search by aca­d­e­mics from Coventry and Aberys­t­wyth Uni­ver­sity said that many photos par­tic­u­larly em­pha­sized men’s mus­cular bi­ceps, pecs, and chest-the body parts which sug­gest phys­ical strength. This cel­e­bra­tion of mas­cu­line cap­ital is achieved through humor and the knowing wink, but the out­come is a reaf­fir­ma­tion of urban hege­monic mas­culinity.” 3 We sug­gest that in Tube­Crush, value is di­rected onto the bodies of par­tic­ular men, cre­ating a vi­sual economy of post-feminist mas­culinity of white­ness, phys­ical strength, and eco­nomic wealth. The paper re­sponds to no­tions of re­verse sexism and post-sexism used to make sense of women’s ap­parent ob­jec­ti­fi­ca­tion of men in the dig­ital space, by asking in­stead where the value of such im­ages lies. “Value is di­rected onto the bodies of men cre­ating a vi­sual economy of mas­culinity of white­ness, phys­ical strength, and eco­nomic wealth.” We use Tube­Crush as a case study to de­velop Berlant’s in­ti­mate publics as a lens for ex­am­ining post-feminist sen­si­bility and mas­culinity in the lim­inal space be­tween home/work. “In this paper, we an­a­lyze the web­site Tube­Crush, where people post and share un­so­licited pho­tographs of ‘guy candy’ seen on the London Un­der­ground. The teaser for the ab­stract on the Taylor & Francis web­site is a hoot: The study was done by Coventry and Aberys­t­wyth uni­ver­si­ties and was pub­lished as part of the Fem­i­nist Media Studies on the Taylor & Francis On­line web­site with the post-modernly title, “He’s a total Tube­Crush: post-feminist sen­si­bility as in­ti­mate publics.” 2 The re­searchers came to this as­tounding con­clu­sion: “Mus­cles and money are qual­i­ties that straight women and gay men typ­i­cally find at­trac­tive in men!” 1 Tube­Crush is a web­site where people post pic­tures of men (“eye candy”) taken sur­rep­ti­tiously on the London Un­der­ground railway system. FOR STATING THE OBVIOUS, a re­cent study by two British uni­ver­si­ties an­a­lyzing im­ages posted on Tube­Crush over a pe­riod of three years is tough to top.












Eye candy men